NH Library supports staff and students conducting research with these tools, technologies and services:
What kind of review?
A systematic review "attempts to identify, appraise and synthesize all the empirical evidence that meets pre-specified eligibility criteria to answer a specific research question. Researchers conducting systematic reviews use explicit, systematic methods that are selected with a view aimed at minimizing bias, to produce more reliable findings to inform decision-making" (Cochrane)
Systematic reviews can take several people at least 6 months to complete -- think about assembling a strong review team that includes content/subject experts, a biostatistics expert (especially if you are planning a meta-analysis), and an information expert/librarian (especially if you want a robust literature search to serve as the foundation for the whole review).
For an overview of the process, see the diagram at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10654-019-00576-5/figures/1
Gold standard guidance/methodology resources
Online learning about conducting systematic reviews
Identifying existing systematic reviews and/or protocols
A structured scoping search should be undertaken of major biomedical databases (i.e. Medline, EMBASE) to identify existing SRs and any relevant published SR protocols.
Also check PROSPERO--International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews
You may also like to check resources such as the Open Science Framework, "a free and open-source project management tool that makes it easier to collaborate throughout a project's lifecycle" for SR protocols.
PRISMA basics (for reporting systematic reviews)
This informative series created by an experienced medical librarian and expert searcher takes you through a guided process on how to create a great search. Watch the whole series or focus in on the area giving you trouble using the full list below.
Searching School by Carrie Price - the complete series
Part 1: Searching School Introduction (3.24 mins)
Part 2: Translating the Research Question (3.56 mins)
Part 3: Boolean Operators (4.55 mins)
Part 4: Subject Headings (4.02 mins)
Part 5: Keywords (5.43 mins)
Part 6: Spelling, Syntax, Line Numbers (2.19 mins)
Part 7: Limits and Filters (3.46 mins)
Part 8: Translating Across Platforms (2.07 mins)
Part 9: Search Reporting (3.15 mins)
Part 10: Searching School Debrief (0.50 mins)
Learn how to conduct a search in CINAHL by combining subject headings and keywords. Created by the Griffith University Library.
Rigorous searching in CINAHL using subject headings and keywords (4.58 mins)
It's not always easy working out which journals to target. We suggest reviewing the impact factors of different journals using:
Journal/Author Name Estimator (JANE) - Find journals which best match the title/abstract of your paper.
Journal impact factors - contact us to request support in determining journal impact factors.
Clarivate Manuscript Matcher - got that article ready to go? Manuscript Matcher can suggest which journals might best suit your research paper. Again, you'll need a free Clarivate account to use this service. Contact us if you encounter any issues accessing this.
Scopus Source List - use the Scopus CiteScore to assess the citation impact of journals.
More questions? Ask NH Library here.